Colour Ranges

Oct 5th, 2011 | | Colour Ranges | 21 Comments

Wartime Camouflage Colours

British Standard Camouflage Colours 1

BS987C: 1942 – Camouflage Colours (1)

This is a ‘toe-in-the-water’ blog. By that I mean that it makes no claim to be a definitive study of British camouflage colours of World War II, merely a distillation of my current knowledge of camouflage colours as far as they relate to buildings. It is largely based on a combination of documentary research and paint analysis of buildings on a) the site of a wartime bomber station and b) a coastal command centre.

The main concern was for the appearance of buildings as seen from the air. The Royal Air Force was not camouflage conscious until the expansion years of 1935-39. In 1935 the Air Ministry Director of Works emphasized to the Air Staff the absence of any policy for concealment and camouflage of RAF establishments at home. Progress was slow, and it was not until 1940 that all three branches of the services had formed camouflage branches.

A General Camouflage Policy was developed in 1938, the aim being to treat, in a practical and economical manner, the distinctive features of an RAF station: buildings, landing grounds, boundaries etc. – so that an enemy pilot would be deceived or confused. It was assumed that the main purpose of airfield camouflage would be achieved if recognition of a target could be delayed, so preventing an attack, or at least causing it to be inaccurate. This General Camouflage Policy remained in force until it was discontinued in 1944.

Camouflaged Building - apologies to copyright owner - source lost

There were two main objectives: firstly, to break up the regularity and conspicuousness of the buildings; and secondly, to break up the airfield into a pattern more closely resembling the surrounding countryside. This was attempted by painting irregular, differently coloured, patches on the roofs, and surrounding ground.

Paint was the object of intensive trials and research, and in 1939 the Paint Research Station at Teddington (now the Paint Research Association published a paper on camouflage paints.

It was decided that the types most suited to this purpose were:

a) Bituminous Emulsions. These were intended for application to surfaces such as tarmac, felted roofs etc. Black bitumen emulsion paint was used for “hedge” painting and was most effective.

b) Silicate Paints. These were used on cement and concrete surfaces.

c) Oil-Bound Water Paints (Distempers). These were used on buildings and roofs, and withstood weathering but not mechanical wear and tear.

This list was further refined and more information on these finishes is given below.

The requirement of large quantities of earth-coloured pigments and the knowledge that supplies from overseas might be interrupted led to a study of natural sources around the country. This culminated in the publication of Wartime Pamphlet No 21 by the Geological Survey of Great Britain in January 1942 – Ochres, Umbers and Other Natural Earth Pigments of England and Wales.

Camouflaged Nissen Hut

Airfield Camouflage
Dusting powders, consisting usually of chalk or gypsum, pigment and adhesive finely ground together were intended for simulation of field patterns on airfields.

On the outbreak of war, camouflage schemes were put into operation as planned. Contracts were let for the supply and application of materials. Firms were allotted one or more Works area each and work in accordance with standard requirements was ordered direct by the superintending engineer who was responsible for the effective camouflage of his station.

Camouflaged Runways
Camouflaged Runways

With the introduction of hard runways, experiments were carried out at Stradishall and Gosport to reduce the “shine” of concrete. At the former station paved areas were treated with fine pre-coloured slag chippings, and at Gosport with coarse pre-coloured stone chippings. Both these specifications being based, incidentally, on non-shine hard tennis court practice.

By the spring of 1940, it was decided to use the “Stradishall” system of texturing runways and paved areas. All Commands agreed to this policy except Fighter Command who were unable to accept the abrasive nature of a “chipped” surface owing to excessive tyre wear. The “Hullavington” specification was adopted for fighter stations, and all fighter runways and hard-standings were coated with what became known as “pervious asphalt”. This was successful, if rather expensive.

Further experiments were made with surfacing materials, and sawdust, tan bark, and granulated rubber were some of a number of materials that were tried. Eventually, wood chips that had been passed through a hammer mill were found to produce a long-lasting product that had very nearly the same optical properties as grass. This became the standard texture treatment for runways until the discontinuance of camouflage in 1944.

By 1942, building camouflage had become restricted or simplified to painting in greens, browns or blacks. In some cases texturing of roofs was effected by applications of either stone or wood chips on a binding medium. [It was in the same year that a range of camouflage paint colours were standardised by the British Standards Institution, and the BS 987C range of blacks, browns, greens, and dull reds came to be developed – see below.]

In the spring of 1943 it was decided that the standard of camouflage could be relaxed in certain parts of the country, which was then divided, for camouflage purposes, into three Priority Regions.

In No 1 Priority Region, which comprised roughly the South and East Coast of England up to the Humber for a depth of 70 miles, camouflage was continued to the original standard. In No 2 Priority Region, comprising an area 30 mile East Coast Belt from the Humber to the North of Scotland, camouflage was restricted to night deception only. In the remainder of the country – No 3 Priority Region – the new requirements implied the virtual abandonment of camouflage in approximately 20 per cent of the total number of stations in the country.

At the same time as this partial relaxation of camouflage, schemes and specifications were overhauled so that as much of the camouflage work as possible could be incorporated as a normal building or constructional item during initial construction or maintenance.

Further relaxations in policy followed in 1944. In April, only darkening down of buildings was permitted in Priority 1 and Priority 2 areas, either when newly constructed or when they became conspicuous due to deterioration of old camouflage. In August, camouflage was practically discontinued with the proviso that preservative painting would continue to be in dark tones or colours.

BS381C: 1944 - Colours for Ready Mixed Paints

BS381C: 1944 - Colours for Ready Mixed Paints

Paint Colours
Following moves made in the paint industry in the early years of the 20th century the first range of standardised paint colours was published in 1930. BS381, which (with additions in 1931) became BS381C: 1931 provided the limited palette of paint colours available from most paint manufacturers throughout the next 25 years. Reduced versions were subsequently issued by the British Standards Institution in 1943 and 1944 (see above). These amended ranges that appeared during the Second World War specified the particular uses that various colours were to be employed. Three categories were given:

a) General Purposes;
b) Special Purpose Colours;
c) Colours Used on Public Service Vehicles.

British Standards for Camouflage Paints
British Standards for Camouflage Paints – BS987: 1942; BS987C: 1942 & BS1128: 1943

A further British Standard paint range appeared in 1942 illustrating a small number of colours for camouflage purposes – this was BS987C: 1942 Camouflage Colours. This range was further amended in 1944.

It is clear, however, that a number of camouflage colours were available before BS987C was brought out. Several paint manufacturers were already advertising “Camouflage and A.R.P. paints” as early as 1940. One brand was rather grandly known as: ‘Prince Regent’s Coloured Bituminous Paint (Emulsified) for camouflage.’ This particular paint was described as being:

‘eminently suitable for application over tarred felt, asphalt, creosoted surfaces, etc. without fear of discoloration. Manufactured in Government approved shades – Gritty and Non-Gritty.’

So at least two years after the first camouflage paints were being manufactured, a British Standard was brought out in order to aid the supply and specification of such paints.

British Standard Camouflage Colours 2

BS987C: 1942 – Camouflage Colours (2)

These were made in four types of paint:

a) Flat Oil;
b) Oil-Bound Water Paint;
c) Bituminous Emulsion, and
d) Wool-Grease Emulsion.

A couple of amendments were issued leading to additions and deletions, not all relevant to buildings. From 1944 SCC15 (Olive Drab) took over from SCC2 (brown). It was meant to be similar to US Army Olive Drab No 9 and was adopted with Lend-Lease and the painting of vehicles in mind. Another colour – SCC 19 – was the colour for tropical clothing and personal equipment.

Paints were tested on and recommended for a wide range of surfaces:

Camouflage Paint Surfaces Chart

Surface Type of Paint
Asbestos-Cement, Concrete Cement, Cement Bricks b, c & d
Asphalt, Bituminous Roofing Felt, Hessian, Bitumen, R.P.M. Sheeting c & other types of paint if approved
Brickwork, Clay Tiles b, c & d
Iron & Steel not previously painted1,Galvanised Iron & Steel, Glass & Slate a, b, c & d
Wood – Bare2 a
Wood – Creosoted none appropriate
Painted Surfaces3 a, b, c & d

1 The surfaces must be satisfactorily prepared prior to the application of camouflage paint. One or, if necessary two coats of primer consisting of dark coloured red lead or white lead/red lead mixture may be required for protective purposes.
2 This surface should be primed before the application of camouflage paint. In general suitably tinted white lead/red lead primers will be suitable.
3 The choice of the type of camouflage paint to be used will be determined by its compatibility with the old paint.

British Standard Camouflage Colours 3

BS987C: 1942 – Camouflage Colours (3)

A brief explanation of the paints mentioned:

Oil-Bound Water Paints
These were prepared with a medium containing both oil and water. Obviously these components do not usually mix, but if an oil is violently agitated with water containing a substance in solution such as glue, an “emulsion” of oil in water is produced, similar to milk, which consists of minute globules of oil permanently suspended in a watery liquid.

An emulsion of linseed oil, or other drying oil, was ground with pigments and extenders to produce paints of this type, which were usually supplied in paste form. They were thinned with water before application, although when applied to exterior surfaces they tended to be thinned with a ‘petrifying liquid’, which was the emulsion medium less the pigments and extenders.

After application the water evaporated, leaving a coating that became washable (to a degree). Further information on 1930s Water Paints can be found HERE and HERE.

It is interesting to note the existence of a publication by the Walpamur company that was issued in 1940 and dealing with camouflage paints sold by that company and pointing out the importance of high infrared reflectance.

Bituminous Emulsions
This type of paint was prepared from bituminous materials emulsified with an agent such as soap so that they could be thinned with water, and pigmented with lime-resisting pigments and dyes. These paints were mainly used on exterior work owing to their weather-proofing properties, and were especially useful on concrete and other alkaline surfaces. Owing to the dark colour of bitumen they could not be made in white or in bright shades. They were subject to the inherent drawbacks of all bituminous materials, however, in that they had a marked tendency to bleed into subsequent coatings.

Some more information on bituminous paints of the 1930s can be found HERE

Wool-Grease Emulsion Paints
These were made by adding the solid ingredients to a preparation of wool grease, made into an emulsion with water. They were chiefly used on exterior surfaces as the coating formed a water-repellent film. It was possible to produce these emulsions in brighter colours than the bituminous variety.

Silicate, or Water-Glass Paints
These were made with a medium that consisted of a special prepartion of sodium silicate (or other alkaline silicates) which became insoluble on drying. Owing to the strongly alkaline nature of this medium the range of pigments which could be incorporated in it was severely restricted. For the same reason silicate paints were liable to attack fabrics brought into contact with them whilst wet; also oil paint could not be applied over them. This type of paint was only suitable for use on brick, concrete, plaster, asbestos cement and similar surfaces.

Flat Oil Paint
As the name suggests, Flat Oil paints were ready-mixed oil paints that dried with a flat finish. Normally this sort of paint was restricted to interior use, but it could be used on external surfaces although it would not have proved very durable.

See Flat Finishes for further information.

Current Availability of Colours
As with almost all the colours shown on this site they could be mixed into conventional modern paint by Papers and Paints Ltd.

Some Sources of Information
1) Notes on Measures to be Taken in the Concealment of Buildings against raiding Aircraft, without incurring Material Expenditure. Issued by the Camouflage Committee, April 1919.
2) The Second World War Works. AP 3236. Air Ministry, 1956.
3) Regulations for Works Services – War 1939 AP 855A (war). June 1941 Reprinted Sept. 1942
4) Schedule of Prices for Works and Repairs to Buildings, &c. of the War Department. HMSO. 1939. (Reprinted 1942). S.O. Code No. 57-430-0-39*
5) Pocock, R.W.. Ochres, Umbers and Other Natural Earth Pigments of England and Wales. Department of Scientific and Industrial Research. Geological Survey of Great Britain. Wartime Pamphlet No 21. January 1942.
6) Baty, Patrick and Martin Bowdler. “Defence Clothing and Textiles Agency (DCTA), Caversfield, Bicester, Oxfordshire. (Domestic Site of former RAF Bicester). A Report Following an Investigation of the Paint Colours on the External Joinery and Metalwork.” 12 March 2000.
7) Clark, Walter. Photography by Infrared – Its Principles and Applications. John Wiley. 1946. P.362.

British Standards
a) BS381C: 1944 Colours for Ready Mixed Paints.
b) BS987: 1942 Camouflage Paints.
c) BS987C: 1942 Camouflage Colours. Incl. Amendments 1 & 2.
d) BS1056: 1942 Painting of Buildings in Wartime.
e) BS1124: 1942 Household Paints for External Use.
f) BS381C: 1943 Colours for Ready Mixed Paints.
g) BS1128: 1943 Recommendations for Primers for Camouflage Paints.
h) BS381C: 1944 Colours for Ready Mixed Paints.

Colours and associated data from BS987C: 1942 and BS381C: 1944 are reproduced by permission of BSI.

It is worth recording that one of the most significant figures in the development of colour standards after the War, David Medd, was called up to the Camouflage Development and Training Centre at Farnham in 1941. Medd, with his colleague, Oliver Cox, was responsible for the development of the Archrome (Munsell) Range.

Papers and Paints can be found here if you want these colours:

View Larger Map


Share and Enjoy:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • StumbleUpon
  • Facebook
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Twitter
  • Google Bookmarks
  • LinkedIn

Leave a Reply

Comments (21)

Alan FordNo Gravatar » 12. Oct, 2011

Fascinating. I first encountered large scale airfield wide camouflage whilst researching RAF Wroughton just outside Swindon. There, war time aerial photographs clearly showed that the semblance of hedges, duplicating the original field outlines on the 1920/30s O/S, had been daubed on the runways and hardstandings. Green areas between these hardstandings had also been treated.

PatrickNo Gravatar » 12. Oct, 2011

Thanks Alan. Unfortunately very little of this has been recorded and both time and redevelopment have caused most signs of it to vanish.

Sally RyderNo Gravatar » 12. Oct, 2011

Discovered you via thetearooms Twitter post, and genuinely found this to be a fascinating article, particularly because it has forced me to think about a subject that hadn’t really crossed my mind before. I am currently reading the book Wartime Britain by Juliet Gardiner, and thanks to your blog I shall be ‘seeing’ it in colour from now on!
Thank you for such an excellent blog, which I shall be revisiting in the future.

PatrickNo Gravatar » 13. Oct, 2011

Thank you Sally. I always find those few colour films/newsreels of wartime Britain fascinating and will be looking at ‘domestic’ colour in the future.

Angela BeaumontNo Gravatar » 13. Oct, 2011

A very interesting article. I have recently been working with one of my students researching the use of disruptive pattern in World War I. The painted ships must have been an exraordinary sight!

PatrickNo Gravatar » 14. Oct, 2011

Thank you Angela. I like the work of Edward Wadsworth, in particular this painting of dazzle-painting, which shows what you describe very well –

Weekend Reading | Historically Speaking… » 14. Oct, 2011

[...] The most you’ll ever need to read about camouflage colors. [...]

ianNo Gravatar » 28. Mar, 2013

Very interesting article.
I am currently building a landscape diorama of an RAF station (Grimsby) and I know from aerial photos that the station was camouflaged.
Built during 1940-41 I am sure that only two colours were used, this guide has certainly helped to confirm things.

PatrickNo Gravatar » 28. Mar, 2013

Thank you. Yes, I hope that this reduces your options and makes life easier.

Jan WindNo Gravatar » 21. Nov, 2013

Any idea about the RAL number of CCS15 (Olive Drab)?
Or how to blend different colors to get CCS15
Need this to order paint for our Valentine tank (1944)

PatrickNo Gravatar » 21. Nov, 2013

You can ask Papers and Paints to mix the paint colours for you. They are at 4 Park Walk, London SW10 0AD.

Jan WindNo Gravatar » 21. Nov, 2013

But I am living in Thw Netherlands…
Think transport will be difficult and expensive
Any other good ideas?


Ian SandersNo Gravatar » 21. Nov, 2013

Interested in this website regarding RAF WW2 aerodrome camouflage, since I am trying to find out more about what my father in law Alan Sorrell might have done as a RAF camouflage officer during the war. The only thing he did say to his children was that they would continue hedgerow lines across the airfield,

PatrickNo Gravatar » 22. Nov, 2013

You might try contacting the RAF Museum. I did a lot of research there and they have a certain amount of useful information on camouflage.

Lindsay JohnsonNo Gravatar » 20. May, 2017

Hello Patrick, thank you for this very interesting post. Do you know if the colours themselves have changed over time? For example, is BS381C middle Brunswick green the same colour as modern BS middle Brunswick green?

I have the colorimetric (xyzY) data from BS381C (a facsimile of the data itself) and have converted the ‘colours’ of a few paints from CIE 1931 Illuminant B to sRGB using tools provided and checked by Bruce Lindbloom. They do not make a close match for the RGB data of their modern equivalents. I am doing this work as a part of a small research team studying WW2 RN paint colours (‘shades’ in Admiralty terminology). Any advice would be most gratefully received.


PatrickNo Gravatar » 20. May, 2017

Thanks for yours. One might have thought that colour standards were set in stone. They are pretty good, but there is ‘slippage’ caused by variance in printed sources, age and surface. As soon as you start to introduce RGBs and colour monitors you open up another can of worms. As soon as one realises that, the process becomes slightly easier. All one can do is to aim high (but don’t be surprised if you miss). Good luck.

Lindsay JohnsonNo Gravatar » 23. May, 2017

Thank you for the reply, Patrick.

Is it fair to say that the colours were intended to remain the same, so modern middle Brunswick green, for example, should at least approximate the colour of WW2 era middle Brunswick green.

In middle Brunswick green, I have picked at random one of the paints whose name has remained unchanged. Another part of the question would be i’s the same true of paints that changed their name, though not their numeric designator (other than the added prefixing numeral, of course)’. Examples are the battleship greys which came to be called Admiralty greys.

I hope that I am not bombarding you!

Kind regards,

PatrickNo Gravatar » 25. May, 2017

Yes. The colours were intended to remain broadly the same. However, the ‘Brunswick Greens’ as a family of colours were achieved by combining Prussian Blue with Chrome Yellow. In reality, some versions would have been yellower and some bluer. They also, as the different versions attest, came in Light, Medium and Dark shades.

The ‘Battleship’ and ‘Admiralty’ Greys are slightly confusing. The 1931, 1943 and 1944 versions of the British Standard show Lt Battleship Grey as No. 31 and Dark Battleship Grey as No. 32. In 1948 these were renumbered 631 and 632. By the 1964 issue of the Standard 631 had become Light Grey and 632 was still Dark Admiralty Grey, However 697 was introduced as Light Admiralty Grey.

Lindsay JohnsonNo Gravatar » 25. May, 2017

Thank you again, Patrick.

(I hope that I am not burdening you with questions – please let me know if so)

Is it likely that the original ‘battleship greys’ were in fact the shades used on RN warships at the time? (e.g. Admiralty Home Fleet Grey as the dark grey, and Mediterranean grey as the light grey).

PatrickNo Gravatar » 25. May, 2017

I suspect so. Does the TSD pamphlet ‘The Camouflage of Ships at Sea’, of 1943, help?

Lindsay JohnsonNo Gravatar » 29. May, 2017

Hello Patrick,

(For some reason the ‘reply’ button didn’t show against your response – this response regards your last re TSD.)

The TSD document is that you refer to is, I believe, CB3098/43. It contained data on nine paints, two of which (G10 and B45, later called G45) we believe to be Home Fleet Grey and Mediterranean Grey, or 507A and 507C, to use their pre-1943 pattern numbers. It gives CIE 1931 Illuminant B data for them in the same manner as the then-current version of 381C.

The TSD document gives the data for G10/Home fleet grey as x=32.0%, y=33.4%, z=34.6% at 10.0% ‘brightness’.

BSC381C gives Dark Battleship Grey as x=32.3%, y=33.1%, z=34.6% at 12.1% ‘shade’.

(Again, both use CIE 1931 Illuminant B.)

The xyz data are not vastly different, but TSD gave a tolerance level of 10% for the brightness of each paint, so at 12.1% in ‘brightness’, BS381C No. 32 would be twice the tolerance level.

Light Battleship Grey is out in colour balance to B45 in similar proportions to the above, but it is quite a bit darker in tone (31.4% ‘shade’ for BS381C No 31, and 40.0% ‘brightness’ for B45). A gross error in testing would be needed to create this disparity, I believe, so one can perhaps assume that it is not as a result of that.

This makes us suspect that the BS Admiralty greys might have matched earlier-than-WW2 versions of the two Fleet Greys.

This, of course, raises more questions: If the intent was to match the Admiralty paints, did the BS colours change to reflect changes in the Admiralty paints (e.g. when blue-black paste replaced black paste) and, if so, how soon after the Admiralty change would the BS have been changed?

A long and somewhat rambling post, sorry Patrick! I will leave it there for now!